"Yes sir" William Rodriguez
FROM PUERTO LA CRUZ .- The National Assembly stepped on the accelerator to pass the constitutional amendment on third reading and then subjected to a referendum.
The consultation process of reform has failed to transcend the mere media field, the most recent opinion surveys of the various surveys reflect dramatic figures on the percentage of the population expressing ignore the content of the reform, these studies this percentage moves in a band between 70% and 80% maximum.
If we analyze this high percentage by side it is also very worrying, 19% who do not believe or does not answer, it is clear conclusion that the consultation process is not very good.
The low awareness of the project explains the high percentage who claims ignorance of the reform and the high percentage who do not answer may reflect a clear trend of abstention or afraid to say, both premises highlight challenges facing those who aspire to build a true participatory democracy, otherwise it is acting from a hypocritical and misleading, especially when this process is drawn forward in the creation of popular power. Today we know that ignorance and bigotry is not built something solid and self-sustaining.
Moreover, the decision of having to block the reform vote is an insult to intelligence, a common move that discredits the debate and discussion and does not hesitate to characterize as incorrect and it can build consensus and make this consultation process on a large stage of discussion among the people who shudder all social strata and produce a major mobilization in the definition of country we want, the model economic and political desire to leave a legacy for our children and future generations. Special mention
want to do with Ramon Martinez and Ismael Garcia, who decided to break with the "yes sir" and have set a sensible position to qualify and a lot of political courage and revolutionary. The cult of personality, serious flaw in this process, historically it has served to generate gross violations of human rights, especially against those who dare to exercise their revolutionary right of criticism and self-criticism.
It's unethical and revolutionary who must assume the leadership of the debate are the first want to disqualify proposals that can not as a political party is doing but its main leaders, some of these political and military neorrevolucionarios forget that there are revolutionaries whose history alone is worthy of respect, Ramon Martinez is not the right, is the old Communist Party of Venezuela, was elected Governor of Sucre as the candidate of MAS for their own leadership before Hugo should appear as a candidate, and during the oil shock was the only governor that our beloved president credited with broad powers to move ships and take oil facilities, several times my responsibility to meet with him in those harrowing days and I must confess I was impressed by his humility and strength in these difficult times the country suffered.
need not worship the personality, what we need is a revolutionary leadership that can tell when you're wrong without fear of being disqualified or dismissed.
14deabrir@gmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment